Reel Society

1May/102

Tribeca 2010: Please Give (With Second Opinion)

Please Give is the fourth time director Nicole Holofcener and actress Catherine Keener have worked on a film together and the first of the four I have seen. This is a prime example of a mediocre picture. The characters are not interesting but not entirely boring either. There are amusing scenes but nothing hilarious and there is no key climactic moment. Please Give is simply a story about a bunch of people living their lives.

Kate (Catherine Keener) and her husband Alex (Oliver Platt) live in an apartment with their daughter. They own a business together in which they sell items they are able to purchase at a discount from family and friends of the recently deceased. The idea of sitting in a chair that someone might have died sitting on would make me feel uncomfortable but apparently a lot of people are fine with it. The film looks into the idea of whether these are simply material items or if they do in fact carry more meaning for friends and family.

The couple is also waiting for their elderly next door neighbor to pass on so they can use her apartment to extend their own. The elderly woman is cared for by her granddaughters Rebecca (Rebecca Hall) and Mary (Amanda Peet) who could not be more different in their personalities. All the characters seem to be going through a problematic stage in their life.

Kate looks to charity work to fulfill herself and possibly make up for any guilt she may have for selling the possessions of the dead. Rebecca is busy caring for her grandmother and has little time for personal relationships of her own. Mary is preoccupied with a clothing store cashier woman who is dating her former boyfriend. She wants to understand what this woman has that she does not. Even the daughter is battling the obstacles of adolescence, primarily the self-esteem killer acne.

Please Give is about how these characters deal with their problems and with each other. The problem is that the story just did not speak to me and I was not able to connect to any of the characters. Holofcener has some interesting things to say but it does not translate to the film. Woody Allen is the master of this type of filmmaking, various New Yorkers dealing with the everyday problems and questions of life. What separates him from everyone else is the sharp wit of his dialog and the unique observations and actions of his characters.

There are no memorable scenes or dialog in Please Give and without either it is nothing more than a mid life drama with some respectable performances. Holofcener has interesting ideas and a voice with the potential to make a truly memorable feature. She needs to demand more of her talented cast and herself.

2/5

SECOND OPINION: Ryan's Take:

Imagine a life where your largest problem was justifying giving a homeless man $20 rather than buying your 13-year-old daughter a $200 pair of jeans. Where you had to live with the moral dread of making exponential profits off the property of recently deceased elderly people. Or where your crude, tactless husband made daily trips to a downtown spa so he could bang your super-hot next door neighbor. So is the plight of Kate (Catherine Keener) in Nicole Holofcener’s Please Give, a film that basks in its own tunnel-visioned metropolitan self-masterbation. There’s a good chance anyone living outside the New York metropolitan area will find this film utterly frustrating, as it's filled with jokes and situations that only hoity-toity upper-class New Yorkers will understand or relate to. Its characters range from self-indulgent and self-centered to vain and vile, its theme—if there is any—is self-serving upper-class pandering, and its plot has all the punch of a lazy Full House episode. Though William Vincent was my least favorite film at Tribeca 2010, this is probably my most hated, if only for its unintentional portrait of a very real, smarmy New York elitism.

Kate’s a vulture—haunts the estates of the recently deceased, buying up old furniture and tchachkas and selling them at an insanely inflated price from within her Greenwich Village-based vintage store. She and her husband, Alex(Oliver Platt), have long been eying their aging neighbor’s (Anne Guilbert) health, hoping to snatch up the apartment she lives in after death, adding it as an extension to their own. Said neighbor’s grandkids, Rebecca (Rebecca Hall) and Mary (Amanda Peet), are aware of this snooping, but are too preoccupied with resentful affairs and budding relationships to help their poor grandmother out. As the film progresses its narrative whizzles and whirls out of control—Oliver starts sleeping with Mary at her spa, Kate’s daughter (Sarah Steele) wakes up with mountainous zits marring her face and decides she needs insanely expensive jeans to make herself feel better, Rebecca starts dating a fuzzy-headed kid who gets almost no screen time, and Mary spies on her ex-boyfriend’s new lover from afar. It’s a plot stretched too thin over a scant 90 minute runtime—you never get to know or care for any of the characters, and since most of what you see of them ranges from snobbery and vanity to downright cruelty and infidelity, you actually end up hating most of them. Kate’s penchant for giving to the poor could be a psychological reflex for her guilt over selling the relics of the dead, or it could be out of genuine concern; unfortunately, these possibilities are never really explored, and since her major conflict arises when she must choose between giving to the needy and buying her daughter designer $200 jeans—and she ultimately buys her daughter the jeans, mind you—it’s difficult to give a shit about her, left alone feel sypathetic for her.

The humor in this film is derived half from character interactions and half from inner-New York knowledge. There’s a running joke about day-tripping to see “the leaves”, something nobody outside New York’s upper-crust will get because, well, the rest of the world has leaves, and New York’s lower-class doesn’t have the cash or time to take a vacation just to see foiliage. Even the narrative backbone—Kate and Alex’s cut-throat effort to claim their neighbor’s apartment, is a past-time of the New York’s upper-echelon. When Kate discovers that a competitor is buying her items and selling them at even higher prices, she’s disgusted; the great meta-irony of this is that the competitor character is nothing more than an exaggerated version of herself, and her reaction mimics that of the audience. This film is filled with hateful, self-centered snobs leading terrible, meaningless existences. Each of the numerous storylines fizzles out to an anti-climax (or no climax whatsoever), leaving audiences with no questions, no morals, no entertainment, and no happiness. For a film with a title like Please Give, this movie certainly doesn’t—is one of the most clear examples of cinematic self-indulgence and heartlessness I can think of in modern times. Avoid it.

1/5*

About Matthew Starr

No description. Please complete your profile.
Comments (2) Trackbacks (0)
  1. Well looks like your second opinion just confirmed mine. Emergency surgery.

    Anyways I saw a tweet from Jason Reitman (director of Juno and Up in the Air) saying how much he loved this movie.

  2. Awww hell. I love Jason Reitman. That makes me sad.


Leave a comment


No trackbacks yet.